Legal Opinion

Douglas v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 20, 2006No. 26173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

Petitioner’s counsel, exercising professional judgment, determined that there was no basis upon which to seek a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming petitioner’s direct appeal. Petitioner then brought this post-conviction relief (PCR) action. Following an evidentiary hearing, the PCR judge held petitioner was entitled to seek belated discretionary review of his direct appeal. We granted certiorari, and now reverse.

ISSUE

Whether the circuit court erred in granting relief where petitioner’s direct appeal attorney did not pursue discretionary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  5. Re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal & Postconviction Relief CasesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clinton Folkes v. Warden NelsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. State v. LylesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Haggins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Dunlap v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API