Howard v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Motion. Case 3. Error to the Harran Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Makshael
delivered the Opinion of the Court,
The amount collectable on the execution, for a failure to return which by a constable this motion was made, hav*nS ^een above live pounds, the motion should have been made in the Circuit Court, and a Justice of the Peace had no jurisdiction to try. it: (Stat. Law, 420-21;) Lane vs Young, (1 Litt. 40;) Abbey vs Thomas, (2 Litt. 166;) Jennings vs Jones, 4 J. J. Marshall, 217,) unless in a case arising after the passage of the act of 1835, approved February 28, 1835—Session Acts, 1834-5, ¶. 301-2.
But as the amount demanded, whether determined by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lane v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822
- Abbey v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wigginton v. MossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Pratt v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901