Wigginton v. Moss
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 9 — APPEAL FROM OLDHAM CIRCUIT COURT. cited 1 Litt., 40; 7 Dana, 168; 2 B. Mon., 526 ; Civil Code, secs. 16, 24,123, 850, 875 ; Rev. Stat., sec. 17, p. 205; lb., sec. 3, p. 231; 18 B. Mon., 225; Ford, fyc., vs. Jett, MS. opinion, September, 1855; Campbell vs..
Read the full summary
CASE 9 — APPEAL FROM OLDHAM CIRCUIT COURT. cited 1 Litt., 40; 7 Dana, 168; 2 B. Mon., 526 ; Civil Code, secs. 16, 24,123, 850, 875 ; Rev. Stat., sec. 17, p. 205; lb., sec. 3, p. 231; 18 B. Mon., 225; Ford, fyc., vs. Jett, MS. opinion, September, 1855; Campbell vs.. Simmons, MS. opinion, June, 1857; 4 Mon., 413; 5 Dana, 58-9. cited Civil Code, sec. 851. An appeal was taken to the circuit court from a judgment of the quarterly court, and the judgment of the circuit court is ■now appealed from.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE WOOD
DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT:
The question made in this case relates to the jurisdiction of the quarterly courts of the Commonwealth.
The jurisdiction of those courts is regulated by the Code of Practice.
All statutes and all laws in force in this State, before the adoption of the Code, in .any case provided for by the Code or inconsistent with its provisions, were repealed and abrogated Sby the adoption of the Code. (See sec. 875.)
The-enactments of the Revised Statutes, by which the jurisdiction of the quarterly courts was regulated, were repealed by the Code of Practice,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bassett v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
- Howard v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scott v. Manchester Print WorksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860