Legal Opinion
County of Suffolk v. Travelers Insurance
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 29, 2003No. CIV.00-5406 DRH MLOPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Suffolk County initiated this action for declaratory judgment regarding Defendants’ duty to indemnify and defend in a separate action in which Suffolk County is the defendant. The Defendants in the instant action filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the underlying action does not implicate the relevant policy periods. As such, Defendants argue that they have no duty to either indemnify or defend Suffolk County. For the reasons discussed infra, this motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND.
A. Facts Common to All Defendants.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Robert J. Rule v. Brine, Inc., Also Known as W.H. Brine Company, and William H. Brine, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003