Legal Opinion
Doe v. American National Red Cross
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided February 25, 1994No. Civ. A. 2:92-1061PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is a motion to strike plaintiffs’ jury demand and for judgment on the pleadings as to plaintiffs’ demand for punitive damages, filed by Defendant American National Red Cross (“ARC”). Plaintiffs brought this state-law tort action against ARC in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, alleging inter alia that Plaintiff Jason Doe, an infant, was infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (“HIV”) by a transfusion during surgery of contaminated blood supplied by ARC. Defendants removed the action to this Court based on American…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- White v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Doe v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- Marcella v. Brandywine HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Jem Transport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Harrington v. AMERICAN NAT. RED CROSS ST. LOUISDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.