Sartain v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSTER, Circuit Judge.
Albert E. Sartain and Lawrence Riehl, plaintiffs in error, were charged with conspiring with each other and with Looney J. Rletcher and Thomas P. Hayden to receive bribes of $1,500 from each of seven named persons, who were to be confined as prisoners in the federal penitentiary at Atlanta, Ga., to influence their official action in granting said prisoners certain special privileges, in violation of section 117, Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10287). Sartain was the warden of the said penitentiary, and Rletcher a deputy warden, while Hayden was one of the chaplains. Riehl had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Bates v. PrebleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Rich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Albert Pick-Barth Co. v. Mitchell Woodbury Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Emma Apodaca v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, LLC, d/b/a Crestview Funeral Home d/b/a Hillcrest Funeral HomeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2025
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927