Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 89-455PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

Ynez and Mary Lopez appeal from the judgment and amended judgment entered against them and in favor of Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona (Farmers) and from the trial court’s order denying their motion for a new trial and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Because we find that the trial court erred in refusing to excuse for cause jurors who were insured by Farmers, refusing to require that Farmers give race-neutral explanations for excusing minority jurors, and giving an improper jury instruction, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

ISSUES ON APPEAL

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Barb v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. McFarlin v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. State v. EddingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee EddingtonArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee EddingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. EddingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API