Legal Opinion

Baars v. Township of Laketon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1910No. Docket No. 95PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J. Assumpsit by John Baars against the township of Laketon, for services rendered. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment of $88.15 in favor of the plaintiff; the same having been rendered in circuit court upon a verdict for that amount. Only $13.15 is involved; defendant having offered in writing, under 3 Comp. Laws, § 10084, to allow judgment for $75. The plaintiff is a highway commissioner, and filed a claim for services with the township board. They allowed him compensation at $2 a day, the minimum amount provided by statute, and for a less num*666ber of days than he claimed to have worked. The amount allowed was $75. He refused to accept this amount, and brought this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People ex rel. Plugger v. Township Board of OverysselMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Clute v. BarronMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elieff v. MarquardtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API