Legal Opinion

Joseph A. Mullan, an Individual v. Quickie Aircraft Corporation, a California Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1986No. 85-1107PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, Quickie Aircraft Corporation (Quickie), appeals from the denial of its motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or in the Alternative for Remittitur or New Trial by the District Court for the District of Colorado. Quickie’s motion was filed after the entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Joseph A. Mullan (Mullan), based on a jury verdict in the amount of $155,000. Quickie raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on negligence per se; (2) whether the district court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Davis v. M.L.G. Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Miller v. City Of MissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Delhomme Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Houston Beechcraft, Inc. And Beech Aircraft Corporation, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Oaklawn ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Ahmad v. FurlongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Trentadue v. Integrity CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Heins v. Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc. (In re Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Huffman v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API