Legal Opinion

Melrose Associates, L.P. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 16, 1999No. 97-415CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The above-captioned case comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and on the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The plaintiff filed a complaint against the United States which seeks remuneration in the form of subsidized rents from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for low-income and moderate-income housing units. Plaintiffs claim is premised upon a budget-based computation, allegedly approved and effectuated by…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hawpe Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Shell Petroleum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. United States v. Photogrammetric Data Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. Gallo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API