National Labor Relations Board v. Planters Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The petition for rehearing filed herein presents no point not already fully considered; and we see no reason to change the decree enforcing the order of the Board. With respect to the reinstatement of the thirteen employees, however, it may be well to make clear that such reinstatement does not mean that they must .be furnished employment at a period when due to the seasonal nature of the respondent’s business no employment is available, but merely that they be restored to their former position and given work when other like employees are given work. Likewise, the order with respect to back…
2Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Stanley v. WimbishCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 776, Iatse (Film Editors), Local 776 (Film Editors) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Bochterle v. Albert Robbins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wilson Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Weems v. Buildex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.