Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1981No. 754 and 821PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

The eight appellants in this matter pled guilty to various charges. They then took exception to the bill of court costs and other fees assessed against them. They now appeal the lower court’s denial of their exceptions.

The appellants were before the court below in two groups of four, divided as indicated in the caption above. The prosecution of each group was, apparently, unrelated to that of the other; as far as can be determined, the two groups of cases have been consolidated for argument before us only because both groups of defendants pled guilty on the same day and were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. CoderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. In the Interest of CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. HouckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Horner v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LarsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. GarzoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. GarzoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Buckland v. County of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API