United States v. Bell
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR IMPOSING SENTENCE
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
I. Findings of Fact
Neither the government nor the defendant, Richard Leonard Bell, has objected to the factual statements contained in the pre-sentence investigation report (PSI). The court therefore adopts those statements as its findings of fact. For purposes of this opinion the court will provide a synopsis of those findings and will highlight the facts that are pertinent to sentencing.
On April 30, 1982, Bell pleaded guilty to two counts of armed bank robbery. He received concurrent sentences of eighteen years on each of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Ofchinick, Daniel R. (Jr.). Appeal of Daniel Ofchinick, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. JimenezDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. William M. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Larry Wayne HankinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Steven H. SandersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John Timothy MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Estelle RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.