Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Getzendanner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1900No. 884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Certieioate oe dissent from the Court of Civil' Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County.

1Opinion of the Court

The accident policy declared on insured John A. Getzendaner in the sum of $25 per week against bodily injuries sustained through external violent and accidental means, as follows, quoting its second clause: `Or if such injuries, independently of all other causes, shall immediately, continuously, and wholly disable and prevent the assured from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation, the company will pay the assured the weekly indemnity before specified, during the continuance of such disability, but not exceeding fifty-two consecutive weeks.'

"The occupation of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. ReddinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance v. BryantTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. North American Accident Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. National Life & Accident Insurance v. O'Brien'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API