Legal Opinion

Stemmler v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1926No. Appeal, 111PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff sued for the loss of an eye due to injuries sustained while riding a bicycle on a public highway in the City of Pittsburgh. He was on his way to work at the time the accident happened, and the roadbed over which he passed contained many ruts and holes in which mud and water had collected. While passing a truck traveling in the opposite direction, one of its wheels dropped into a hole in the cartway approximately a foot deep, causing mud and water to splash in plaintiff’s face. Small stones or gravel in the mud penetrated his left eye, causing injuries…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steck v. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Thomas v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Bruggeman v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Quinlan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stone v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Welser v. United Gas Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Fehrs v. McKeesportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Cusatis v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API