Legal Opinion

Stratmeyer v. Hoyt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Cowt. — E. G-. Albert, Judge. Action to recover the contract price of a -monument. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the district court. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

I. It is agreed that, on the 23d day of March, 1916, the plaintiff and -defendant entered into the following written contract:

“The said Stratmeyer agrees to furnish and erect on the cemetery lot belonging to M. A. Hoyt estate in the cemetery at Carroll, Iowa, a monument of the following specifications, to wit:
“An exact duplicate as to material, quality, workmanship, finish and dimensions, excepting as to lettering, of the A. B. Cummins family monument in the cemetery at Des ■ Moines, Iowa. The finish of said monument to be what is known as ‘twelve-cut hammered work.’
“The lettering on said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Littell v. Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Gorton v. BrothersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Riggs v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lautenbach v. MeredithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Roland A. Wilson v. Forty-O-Four Grand Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Farrington v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Huffman v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. S. Hanson Lumber Company v. De MossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API