Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Hill

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1954No. 48489PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

— This is an action in equity to recover $175.93 as the balance due for cement work at defendants’ home and to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien therefor. Defendants filed cross-petition for $493 for claimed failure of plaintiff to perform the contract in a workmanlike manner. Following trial, the court held the work was not done in all particulars in a workmanlike manner and therefore plaintiff’s claim should be reduced $75 — ten per cent of the full contract price. From decree for plaintiff for $100.93 and establishing and foreclosing mechanic’s lien therefor defendants have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lautenbach v. MeredithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Littell v. Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Bell v. PierschbacherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Hampton v. BurrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Stratmeyer v. HoytSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Busker v. SokolowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Roland A. Wilson v. Forty-O-Four Grand Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Farrington v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Flynn Builders, L.C. v. Matthew P. Lande and Chris LandeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. S. D. & D. L. Cota Plastering Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API