Legal Opinion

In re Automotive Wire Harness Systems Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 12, 2012No. MDL Nos. 2311, 2349, 2350, 2351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Before the Panel are three dockets involving allegations of conspiracies to inflate, fix, raise, maintain, *1350or artificially stabilize prices of certain automobile components. Moving plaintiffs in each docket, -with overlapping named plaintiffs and counsel, have moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize all MDL No. 2349, MDL No. 2350, and MDL No. 2351 actions in the Eastern District of Michigan before Judge Marianne 0. Battani. All responding plaintiffs and defendants 1 support the motion.

This litigation currently consists…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & "Erisa" LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2002
  2. In re American Medical Systems, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  3. In Re Regions Morgan Keegan Securities, Derivative & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
  4. Bott v. Delphi Automotive LLPUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Generic Digoxin & Doxycycline Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
  2. In re Walgreens Herbal Supplements Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API