Legal Opinion

In re Walgreens Herbal Supplements Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 9, 2015No. MDL Nos. 2619, 2620, 2621, 2622PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair.

Before the Panel:* Before the Panel are four dockets arising from a New York state investigation into the herbal supplements industry, which allegedly found based on DNA barcode testing that store brand supplements sold by Walgreens, Wal-Mart, GNC, and Target contained fillers and contaminants in place of the herbal ingredients listed on the product labels.

Plaintiffs in six actions move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize each of the above-captioned dockets on a retailer-specific basis in various districts. In MDL No. 2619, plaintiff in one action seeks…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Auto Body Shop Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. In re Automotive Wire Harness Systems Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  3. In re Frito-Lay North America, Inc. "All Natural" LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Prods. Liab. Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
  2. In re 100% Grated Parmesan Cheese Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API