Legal Opinion

Trueblood v. Shellhouse

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1898No. 2,287PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

— This was an action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien brought by appellees against appellants. Bogers, who was made a party defendant to answer to his interest, filed a disclaimer. There was a trial by the court, a special finding of facts, and decree in favor of appellees. The action was brought under the provisions of the mechanic’s lien law oE 3883 (Acts 1883, p. 140), as amended by the act of 1889 (Acts 1889, p. 257), and by the act of 1891 (Acts 1891, p. 28, section 7255, Burns’ R. S. 1894). Appellees sought to recover for materials furnished both the contractor and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ogden v. . AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Smith v. NewbaurIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Midland Railway Co. v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Barker v. BuellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Saint Joseph's College v. Morrison, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Indiana Toll Road Commission v. BartuschIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Fletcher Avenue Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Thomas J. Henderson, Inc. v. LeibowitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Rhodes v. SelvageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API