Legal Opinion
Parks v. Schoellkopf Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 27, 1921No. 1803PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge. Suit by F. T. Parks against, the Schoell-kopf Company, in which the defendant brought a cross-action against plaintiff. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.
F. T. Parks, appellant, sued the appellee Schoellkopf Company to recover a balance alleged to be due him on a salary contract and for a small remnant of goods, totalling $529. The appellee answered by general denial and by cross-petition. As the facts stated in the cross-action are substantially proven, we will set out the cross-petition:
“(1) That in the year 1916 the plaintiff (Parks) claimed to have individually a contract with the Batavia Company of Batavia, N. Y., a manufacturing concern, granting him the right to sell its. products, comprising automobile tires or casings, and other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Armstrong v. O'BrienTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Borden v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Hahl v. KelloggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Northern Texas Traction Co. v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Allison v. HarrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
- Bute v. StickneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.