Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Gould
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided March 14, 2019No. 16 CV 2885 (VB)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vincent L. Briccetti, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Michael Monroe, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Sergeant Gould, Police Officer Eric Ramos,1 and the Town of Haverstraw Police Department, in connection with allegedly unlawful searches conducted at the scene of plaintiff's arrest on September 29, 2014, as well as a later body cavity search at the Haverstraw police station.
Before the Court is defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Doc. # 107).
For the reasons set forth below, defendants' motion is GRANTED IN PART…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amigon v. LuzonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Bowden v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Chaney v. GaviganDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Dawson v. The City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Dinkins v. The State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.