Legal Opinion

Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 10, 2006No. Consol. Court. 03-00203Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge:

In this case, on remand from the Court of Appeals from the Federal Circuit, the court must determine whether the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) has complied with the “carousel provision” of 19 U.S.C. § 2416 with respect to its retaliatory duty list, created as a result of the hormone beef dispute between the United States and European Community (“EC”). Pursuant to the statute, the USTR must either undertake a periodic review and revision of the list unless she qualifies for one of two statutory exceptions to this mandate: (1) that the USTR believes that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  4. Gilda Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API