Legal Opinion
Tully v. Rush County Prosecutor Barada
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 17, 2010No. 09-3237PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Michael Tully sued Paul Barada and Catherine Custer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that they violated his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments by summoning him into court and initiating juvenile proceedings against him without probable cause. The district court dismissed Tully’s case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Wayne Elwell was in his home, located about a football field’s length from a county-road bridge in Rush County, Indiana, when he observed that near the bridge were the headlights of a vehicle…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Owens v. Baltimore City State's Attorneys OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Ellis v. CCA OF TENNESSEE LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Ray v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Serino v. HensleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Simpson v. Franciscan Alliance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.