Legal Opinion

Ottinger v. Arenal Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This is an application to cancel a lis pendens. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the moving defendant from erecting a public garage upon its property. Plaintiff is the owner of the adjoining premises. The property is in a zone restricted against public garages, but the board of standards and appeals pursuant to resolution granted a permit for the erection of a public garage on the defendant’s property. It is claimed that the action taken by the board of standards and appeals is invalid, among other reasons, because of the fact that, although required to give public notice, it failed to notify…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Steinway & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Anderson v. . Steinway SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. McManus v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Moeller v. WolkenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Penataquit Ass'n v. FurmanNew York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API