Legal Opinion

Penataquit Ass'n v. Furman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRitchie, J.

This is a motion for an order vacating the lis pendens heretofore filed in this action or, in the alternative, to compel plaintiffs to post a bond to indemnify defendant owners in the case of plaintiffs’ failure to successfully prosecute this cause. The action is for a declaratory judgment and is brought by a group of property owners, some of whom are banded together in a membership corporation known as the Penataquit Association, Inc. The defendants Sands and Bayslip Realty Corp. are the owners of property affected by a change in the zoning law made by other defendants as members of the town…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moeller v. WolkenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Klunder v. HansenNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Ottinger v. Arenal Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. E & E HAULING, INC. v. County of Du PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Oster v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Penataquit Ass'n v. FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API