Legal Opinion

Thompson v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1934No. 23101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “It is declared in the Penal Code, § 416: ‘Any person who shall pursue his business, or the work of his ordinary calling on the Lord’s day, works of necessity or charity only excepted, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.’ Where the business or work of ordinary calling of a person is that of manager of a moving-picture theatre, such employment is not ordinarily a ‘work of necessity’ within the meaning of that code section. The case differs on its facts from Williams v. State, 167 Ga. 160 (144 S. E. 745), in which it was held: ‘In the light of modern-day methods of traveling by automobile, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Academy v. BohlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Thompson v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Albany Theatre Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Loach v. City of LaFayetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API