Legal Opinion

United States v. McCastle

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 26, 1994No. ACM S28779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HEIMBURG, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, Airman First Class (A1C) McCastle was convicted by military judge, sitting alone, of use of cocaine. Violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (1988). His approved sentence is a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-1. A1C McCastle has assigned two errors: the military judge erred in failing to suppress his confession for lack of corroboration and his trial defense counsel was ineffective in failing to move to dismiss the charge and specification as illegally derived from a command-directed urinalysis. We find…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. McCastleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. MatthewsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  4. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. McIntyreUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API