Lucky Investments, Inc. v. Adams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. *
Mary Adams appeals from an adverse judgment in an action brought by Lucky Investments, Inc., to recover the balance alleged to be due and owing on each of three promissory notes executed by Adams. She contends that the trial court has entered a deficiency judgment of the sort prohibited by section 580b of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that “No deficiency judgment shall lie in any event after any sale of real property for failure of the purchaser to complete his contract of sale, or under a deed of trust, or mortgage, given to secure payment of the balance of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Stone v. LobsienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Fahrney v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Valinda Builders, Inc. v. BissnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Jackson v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Shepherd v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash Partners (In Re Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Redman Industries, Inc. v. Tower Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.