Legal Opinion
Washington v. City & County of SF
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1954No. Civ. No. 15655PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
123 Cal.App.2d 235 (1954)
GEORGE WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant.
Civ. No. 15655.
California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One.
Feb. 17, 1954.
Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Thomas M. O'Connor, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.
Keith, Creede & Sedgwick for Respondent.
FINLEY, J. pro tem. [fn. *]
This is the second appeal in this case. The first was taken by plaintiff and resulted in this court setting aside a judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict for plaintiff and is reported in 111 Cal.App.2d 368 [244 P.2d 774]. Defendant then moved for a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bagwill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Brandes v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bailey v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilkinson v. Bay Shore Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986