Latta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentPellegrini, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I believe the majority erred in holding that a claimant whose benefits are suspended is obligated to produce medical evidence as to his already established partial disability.
On March 24, 1977, John Latta (Claimant) suffered a work-related injury to his right arm while employed by Latrobe Die Casting Company (Employer). He received workmen’s compensation benefits until they were suspended because of his return to a “light duty” position. On October 20, 1979, Claimant and his fellow employees went on strike. After the strike ended, employees were called back to work in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Dancison v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Latta v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Goodyear v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.