Legal Opinion

ESTATE OF ROXAS v. Marcos

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2009No. 28702Published

1Opinion of the Court

202 P.3d 584 (2009)

ESTATE OF Roger ROXAS; and The Golden Budha Corporation, a foreign corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Imelda MARCOS, Defendant-Appellant, and Ferdinand Marcos, Defendant.

No. 28702.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai`i.

February 12, 2009.

Lex R. Smith, (Kobayashi, Sugita & Goda), Honolulu, on the briefs, for Defendant-Appellant.

Ward D. Jones, (Bervar & Jones), Honolulu, Daniel C. Cathcart, (Maga~na, Cathcart, McCarthy), on the briefs, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

FOLEY, Presiding Judge, with LEONARD, J., Concurring Separately; and NAKAMURA, J., Dissenting.

Opinion of the Court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Keliipuleole v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lingle v. Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API