Legal Opinion

(PS) Dayton v. Fairfield Mobile Home and Rv Park LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 16, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00850Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD RANDOLPH DAYTON, No. 2:24-cv-00850-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 FAIRFIELD MOBILE HOME and RV PARK, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 18 Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the Court are Defendant Thomas Ferrara’s Motion to Dismiss 19 (ECF Nos. 9, 14, 17)1 and Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 18). The Court 20 recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API