Fox v. Fox

Nahmias, Justice.

In this divorce case, the husband disputed the validity and enforceability of the parties’ self-styled “Premarital Agreement.” He argued, among other things, that the agreement is actually a “marriage contract . . . made in contemplation of marriage,” OCGA § 19-3-63, but it was not attested by two witnesses as required by that statute to be valid. The trial court agreed, and we affirm.

1. In 2000, appellant Joanne Fox (“Wife”) and appellee Lyle M. Fox (“Husband”) divorced after 25 years of marriage. The divorce decree and incorporated settlement agreement required Husband to…