Legal Opinion

City of Peoria v. Heim

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 17, 1992No. 3—91—0917, 3—91—0963 consPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCUSKEY

The City of Peoria (City) appeals the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Roger Heim. We affirm.

On August 30, 1989, the City filed a complaint against Roger Heim for failing to have one parking space for each dwelling unit at 103 and 105 N.E. Roanoke. The City alleged that Heim violated section 2 — 22.1033, appendix B, of the code of the City of Peoria (the Code). Heim purchased these properties in 1975. The uncontradicted evidence established (1) the structure located at 103 N.E. Roanoke was converted from a one-family residence to a four-unit, multi-family dwelling prior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Northbrook v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Baron v. AbtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. City of Tuscola v. D & B Refuse Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. City of Chicago v. ChiagourisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Raker v. Village of MaquonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Kankakee v. AnthonyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Village of Plainfield v. American Cedar Designs, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Co. of Kankakee v. AnthonyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Village of Plainfield v. American Cedar Designs, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API