City of Peoria v. Heim
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCUSKEY
The City of Peoria (City) appeals the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Roger Heim. We affirm.
On August 30, 1989, the City filed a complaint against Roger Heim for failing to have one parking space for each dwelling unit at 103 and 105 N.E. Roanoke. The City alleged that Heim violated section 2 — 22.1033, appendix B, of the code of the City of Peoria (the Code). Heim purchased these properties in 1975. The uncontradicted evidence established (1) the structure located at 103 N.E. Roanoke was converted from a one-family residence to a four-unit, multi-family dwelling prior to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Northbrook v. CannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Baron v. AbtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- City of Tuscola v. D & B Refuse Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- City of Chicago v. ChiagourisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Raker v. Village of MaquonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Kankakee v. AnthonyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Village of Plainfield v. American Cedar Designs, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Co. of Kankakee v. AnthonyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Village of Plainfield v. American Cedar Designs, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000