Legal Opinion

Berry v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, L.L.P.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2010No. 2009-1507Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Berry v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, L.L.P., 127 Ohio St.3d 480,

2010-Ohio-5772.] BERRY ET AL., APPELLEES, v. JAVITCH, BLOCK & RATHBONE, L.L.P., APPELLANT. [Cite as Berry v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, L.L.P., 127 Ohio St.3d 480,

2010-Ohio-5772.] When parties to a tort claim have executed a settlement agreement and consent judgment entry, one party may not subsequently institute a separate cause of action for fraud in the inducement of the settlement agreement without seeking relief from the consent judgment and rescinding the settlement agreement. (No. 2009-1507 — Submitted May 11, 2010…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Haller v. Borror Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. RichIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bryant v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API