Legal Opinion

Gluck v. Texas Animal Health Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1973No. 15223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Chief Justice,

Appellee, an agency of the state of Texas, was granted a mandatory injunction upon its motion for summary judgment, whereby appellant was commanded to submit for brucellosis testing the cattle he owns or controls on his premises in Frio County in accordance with Section 23A(17) of Article 1525b, Vernon’s Tex. Penal Code Ann. (1972-1973 Supp.), hereinafter referred to as the Brucellosis Control Act. 1 Appellant superseded said judgment and perfected this appeal.

Appellant asserts four assignments of error. He urges that the pleadings do not allege the ownership, part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Shoppers World, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Crouch v. CraikTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Nunley v. Texas Animal Health CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Pitman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A. v. Texas Motor Vehicle CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Vietnamese Fishermen's Ass'n v. Knights of the Ku Klux KlanDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1982
  4. Johnson v. Texas Animal Health CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API