Legal Opinion

Hanig v. Town of Sudbury

Massachusetts Land Court

Decided July 9, 2021No. MISC 18-000404Published

1Opinion of the Court

HANIG vs. TOWN OF SUDBURY, MISC 18-000404

ROBERT L. HANIG and MILADA HANIG, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF SUDBURY, et al., Defendants, and AUDREY KERN and HENRY E. OPLAND, Defendants-Intervenors

MISC 18-000404

JULY 9, 2021

MIDDLESEX, ss.

SMITH, J.

DECISION

This case concerns the legal status of the unpaved portion of the roadway known as Lincoln Lane in Sudbury, Massachusetts. The Plaintiffs, Robert L. Hanig and Milada Hanig (the "Hanigs"), live on the unpaved portion of Lincoln Lane and assert that it is a public way, thereby obligating the Defendant, Town of Sudbury (the "Town"), to provide municipal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gamache v. Mayor of North AdamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Fenn v. Town of MiddleboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. LaBarge v. Chief Admin. Justice of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Siegemund v. Building Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Boothroyd v. BogartzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API