Legal Opinion

Estate of Kaminski

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1941No. Civ. 12971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

Belle Kaminski died leaving an instrument testamentary in character. After a contest initiated by appellant, who is a brother of decedent, the trial court found said instrument to be a valid holographic will, and with the exception of two names appended thereto, that “said document was entirely written, dated and signed by the hand of the testatrix herself. ’ ’ .

From the judgment admitting said document to probate as the last will and testament of said decedent, and directing that letters testamentary be issued to respondent Milton Grostein, another brother of testatrix, this appeal is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kinney v. GardellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In Re Estate of JepsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Goldberg v. BlochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Estate of GardenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. In Re McNair's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Estate of RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API