Potts v. State

MAUS, Judge.

The movant was charged with forcible rape in violation of § 566.030.1, RSMo *627Cum.Supp.1984. As a result of a plea bargain, he entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years. He filed a motion under Rule 27.26 to set aside that plea and sentence. He now appeals from the denial of that motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The movant’s pro se motion was amended and supplemented by appointed counsel. The motion court held a hearing to determine if the movant was entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing upon that amended and supplemented motion. Following that…