Williams v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Senior Judge.
Appeal from summary denial of movant-defendant’s Rule 27.26 motion. We had affirmed defendant’s robbery conviction in State v. Williams, 624 S.W.2d 127 (Mo.App.1981).
Defendant’s complaint alleges trial counsel was ineffective. To be entitled to a hearing on this a defendant must plead facts rather than conclusions; claims that counsel’s failure to present defenses must be described and shown to have been dis*18coverable. Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 407 l.c. 411 (Mo. banc 1974). See also Greenhaw v. State, 627 S.W.2d 103[6, 7] (Mo.App.1982) holding: “The claim that an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Greenhaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franklin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Laws v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kline v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gillespie v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Edwards v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.