In re the Estate of Keough
New York Surrogate's Court
Application by husband to require executor to set apart for his benefit money in lieu of articles exempted under subdivision 3, section 2713 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodbury S.
The deceased testatrix left her surviving a husband, the petitioner, and no minor children. The inventory and appraisal returned by the executor and filed October 27, 1903, show that none of the articles enumerated in subdivision 3, section 2713 of the Code of Civil Procedure were in existence at the time of the death of the testatrix, and the petitioner asks that the money value of said articles be set apart to him in lieu thereof.
The property of the estate, after setting apart to the husband $150, under subdivision 5 of this section, consists of $936.95 cash in 'bank, and a few…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kneettle v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Burch v. . NewburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Johnson v. CorbettNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Woodward v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1820
- Wilcox v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Transfer Tax on the Estate of LiboltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- In re Mehn's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1910