Legal Opinion
FAKLA v. BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 2, 2024No. 2:22-cv-04126Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOHN FAKLA, Civil Action No: 22-4126 (SDW) (SDA) Plaintiff, OPINION v. MATTHEW GEIST, et al., August 2, 2024 Defendants. WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court is Defendants Matthew Geist (“Defendant Geist”) and Mark Melchiorre’s (“Defendant Melchiorre, together with Defendant Geist, “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56 (D.E. 105 (“MSJ”)) and Plaintiff John Fakla’s (“Plaintiff”) cross-motion to reopen discovery pursuant to Rule 16(b)(4). (D.E.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.