State v. Rojas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
R.C. 2929.05(A) requires a three-part analysis in capital cases. First, we must review the judgment and consider Rojas’ claims of error. Second, we must independently weigh the evidence of aggravating circumstances and mitigating factors. Third, we must decide whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the convictions and uphold the sentence of death.
*137I
Constitutional Issues
In proposition of law No. I, Rojas (for convenience, we will refer to claims by counsel as being made by Rojas although…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court · 1995
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.