Legal Opinion

Wall-A-Hee v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1935No. 25182. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

Three separate actions are here consolidated for the purpose óf trial and appeal. They were brought to recover the value of thirty-six horses killed or rendered valueless by smothering during transportation over the railway of the defendant, Northern Pacific Railway Company.

The owners of the horses, all full-blooded Indians, were to appear with the horses and equipment in an Indian village presentation at the Western Washington Pair, at Puyallup. One of the plaintiffs, Noah Saluskin (frequently referred to in the record as Chief Saluskin), in April, 1931, entered into a contract with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oakes v. N. P. R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Saunders v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  3. Anderson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Kristianson v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  5. American Railway Express Co. v. GaltMississippi Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clubb v. HetzelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API