Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. v. Franco

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 11, 1997No. 13-95-322-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YANEZ, Justice.

Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., appeals from a judgment, rendered on a jury verdict, that it is liable to two former employees for intentional infliction of emotional distress and retaliatory termination under the Commission on Human Rights Act, Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 21.055 (Vernon 1996) (hereinafter “CHRA”).1 By five points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, the attorney’s fees, reinstatement, and punitive damages awarded, and the admission of particular documents into evidence. Appellees raise a contingent cross-claim. We affirm in…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. v. FrancoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Swate v. Medina Community Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. McMillon v. Texas Department of Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Jane Doe v. Beaumont I.S.D.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
  5. Scribner v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API