Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
William Alsup, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Endangered Species Act, plaintiffs seek protection for the Pacific fisher. All parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED IN PART and defendants' motions are DENIED .
STATEMENT
The fisher is a medium-sized brown mammal in the weasel family found only in North America. It has a long body with short legs and a long bushy tail. Fishers naturally populate in low densities over large, non-overlapping ranges.
Beginning in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Native Ecosystems Council v. U.S. Forest Service, an agency of U.S. Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Center for Biological Diversity v. HaalandDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019