Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Wild Adventures, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 2008No. A07A2335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

According to his complaint, plaintiff Roberto Diaz slipped and fell in rainwater, which had accumulated around the bumper car ride at Wild Adventures Theme Park in Valdosta. Diaz and his wife, Nadiezhda Kozlovskaya (“Nadia”), filed this premises liability action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Diaz in the fall and for Nadia’s loss of consortium. The trial court granted summary judgment to Wild Adventures, Inc., and Diaz and Nadia appeal. We affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Norman v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Dickerson v. Guest Services Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. Walker v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Cottingham v. SappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. DIXON v. KRAUSE Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Charles Jackson v. TA Operating LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
  5. JULIE B. HAZARD v. MEDLOCK TAVERN, INC. D/B/A OLD FOUNTAIN TAVERNCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API