Walker v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Chauncey Walker appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Sears Roebuck & Company in this “rainy day” slip and fall case. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. Matjoulis v. Integon…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Gentile v. Miller, Stevenson & Steinichen, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dickerson v. Guest Services Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Drew v. Istar Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Hayward v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Smith v. Morris, Manning & Martin, LLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Walmart Stores East L. P. v. Benson.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.