Legal Opinion

In re Askovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

On or about the 29th of November, 1928, the respondents and appellant made a written contract by which the respondents agreed to alter two buildings owned by the appellant' at 120 South Eighth street, Brooklyn. The contract price. was $11,500. It contained the following provisions for arbitration:

“ 29. All questions in dispute under this contract which may at any time arise shall be submitted to arbitration at the choice of either party to the dispute. * * * Either party hereto may give notice in writing to the other of a desire and request to so arbitrate. It is understood and agreed that if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brendsel v. WINCHESTER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. In re the Arbitration between Manitt Construction Corp. & J. S. Plumbing & Heating Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Zaubler v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Brendsel v. WINCHESTER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API